Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Evening Courier site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

We have a right to the truth



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 October 2008
ON the one hand, the decision by Calderdale Council to deny the Courier access to key letters surrounding the Sugden's Mill debacle is understandable.
Its failure after 10 years of posturing to acquire the site in the middle of Brighouse by compulsory purchase, to build a long-promised swimming pool, was a big enough embarrassment.

Auditor Grant Thornton has subsequently demanded a shake-up in the way the council handles major development projects and stressed the need for the right numbers of experienced and dedicated officers to manage such high-profile schemes in future.

A second and even more damning interpretation of what had gone wrong came from the council's own auditors.

According to them "governance, senior accountability, project roles, project resourcing, statutory officer involvement, communication, documentation and risk management were lacking".

All in all a poor state of affairs and not the council's finest hour.

It is one thing to have tried and failed, but an altogether different matter when failure has come about through poor planning and procedure.

That is why the Courier remains interested in full disclosure on this matter and that means we, and our readers, be shown these letters, in particular one between the Grant Thornton and the council chief executive, that has so far remained secret.

We asked for access under the Freedom of Information Act, but the request was declined because "it would prejudice the management of local government administration and therefore the effective conduct of public affairs".

Of course we are considering appealing against this decision as is our right.

We would do so it because from a taxpayer's point of view this has been a huge waste of money, time and resources. And that is something that cannot be taken lightly in today's climate.

The full article contains 300 words and appears in Evening Courier newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 October 2008 9:36 AM
  • Source: Evening Courier
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

oldwarrior,

03/10/2008 11:32:35
yes, you should definetley appeal against this decision. If it causes embarrassment to the council - so what?
2

,

04/10/2008 19:35:42
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Sing a Song for Christmas 2008: Choose your favourite
All Saints
Bailiffe Bridge
Barbara's
Beech Hill
Burnley Road Primary
Burnley Road Singing for Fun
Cragg Vale
Elland
Field Lane
Hebden Royd
Lee Mount
Lightcliffe
Ling Bob
Lorraine
Maltings
New Road
Northowram
Parkinson Ln
Sacred Heart
Savile Park
St John's
St Joseph's
St Malachy's Primary
St Malachy's Singing for Fun
St Mary's, Halifax
St Mary's, Mill Bank
Sowerby Village
Stubbings
Triangle

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.