Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 21st July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The (stormy) case for the prosecution



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
01 May 2008
Six court cases in four months have drawn criticism from Crown Court judges.
Where does the buck stop?
To suffer the wrath of a crown court judge just once might be considered bad enough.

But recently three judges have expressed concern in cases where they felt defendants had not been, or were not originally due to be, prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

The judges appeared to blame the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – and they are not the only ones pointing the finger.

Police have also approached the Courier anonymously with their concerns.
They have criticised the CPS, saying it tried to drop a case that resulted in three armed robbers being jailed.

The CPS allegedly did not want to proceed against the men. When they did, the outcome was lengthy prison sentences.

A police source said: "The Crown Prosecution Service attempted to drop this case despite there being overwhelming evidence against the men, including security camera footage of the robbery.

"Serious concerns have to be raised when the CPS is calling for cases like this, where the evidence is there and the offenders plead guilty, to be dropped.

"It is not surprising that officers throughout West Yorkshire feel let down by the justice system."

But Neil Franklin, chief Crown prosecutor for CPS West Yorkshire, was swift to dismiss the comments, claiming the case was handled correctly and any notice to discontinue was because police had failed to gather sufficient evidence.

Alleged CPS failings have included charging a man with violent disorder and having an offensive weapon instead of wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm – an offence that can carry a life sentence.

And more recently, prosecuting a drug baron with producing a class C drug instead of possession with intent to supply.

Both cases have prompted internal investigations by the CPS and one has resulted in new guidance for prosecutors.

Referring to the drugs case of Keith Simmons, Supt Alan Ford, of Calderdale Police, said: "It is for the police to investigate and gather the evidence.

"The final decision as to whether to charge and what that charge should be is for the CPS.

"It is pleasing to note that in terms of the investigation, the judge's comments clearly reflected the quality of evidence gathered and presented to the court."

Tom McGhee, chairman of West Yorkshire Police Federation, suggested the CPS had been blinded by a target culture and went so far as to call for the removal of its lawyers from police stations with charging duties returned to custody sergeants.

But Michael Quinn, area Crown prosecutor, said: "In view of the large number of cases that we prosecute and the difficult decisions we take on a daily basis, there is always a risk of occasional criticism.

"Where that criticism is justified we always ensure that lessons are learned so that the communities we serve can have confidence in the high quality of our work.

"The small number of cases attracting judicial criticism concerns us greatly and we do respond constructively, positively and energetically to this criticism.

"However, it needs to be remembered that we handle over 4,000
cases a year at our crown courts and the fact there has
been criticism in relation to five or six cases needs to be seen in this context."

The police and CPS claim to be part of a multi-agency partnership. But each has differing targets. This has been demonstrated by contradictory figures provided by the courts and CPS, one showing a decline in workload, the other an increase in workload.

Mr Quinn said: "Crown prosecutors have to make difficult casework decisions on files and we always seek to ensure that those decisions reflect the seriousness of the offending and level of criminality.

"These decisions are subject to continuous review as further evidence and information often comes to light after the original charging decision."

Judges' concerns
January 30, 2008: Judge Jonathan Durham Hall expresses concern that the CPS twice tried to drop the case of Royal axeman Daniel Bleazard.
February 22: Judge Robert Bartfield is critical of the level of charge brought against knuckleduster thug Wayne Anthony Kinder.
February 29: Judge Bartfield makes a similar criticism after Daniel Hodgeman is given a community order for assaulting a police officer in Queensbury.
March 5: Recorder Mark Cran reproaches the CPS for dropping an allegation of being drunk in charge of a vehicle against Richard Andrew.
March 21: Judge Durham Hall describes the CPS's reasons for not pursuing charges of common assault and assault occasioning actual bodily harm against Lee Muir as lame.
March 21: The Courier is told the CPS tried to drop the case against Mohammed Bilal Ali, Akaas Pervez, and Wajid Hussain. They admitted robbery and were each jailed for seven years.
April 2: Judge Bartfield ironically described as the "best deal of the year" a decision to charge drug baron Keith Simmons with merely producing a class C drug instead of possession with intent to supply.

The full article contains 838 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2008 9:06 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
2
1

helyg,

01/05/2008 09:32:41
The CPS is a disgrace, i feel for the police who do their best to gather what should be enough evidence and the CPS let them and our society down, it needs a good shake up
2

Growler,

01/05/2008 09:48:14
I totally agree with your comment. The police get the blame for many things but at the end of it all, the decisions are all made by the CPS and the majority of the times its always the wrong decision. The CPS need looking into.
3

Letsbefair,

Leeds 01/05/2008 10:16:08
Criticism in a handful of cases out of over 4000 which are prosecuted well is hardly a 'scandalous' headline is it?
I suppose the CPS do make the odd mistake (doesn't eveyone?!), but it must be remembered that the CPS are the experts in the amount & quality of evidence it takes to gain a conviction. Police Officers are not, whatever they might think. CPS often have to drop cases because Police Officers don't 'come up with the goods' evidentially despite promises.
Many Police Officers don't like the CPS at the moment because CPS are demanding higher quality investigations. Judges and Barristers don't like the CPS at the moment because CPS are prosecuting more and more cases 'in-house' and therefore taking work away from their 'old boys club'. No wonder so many of these people are taking pot shots at CPS...!
4

MattBingo,

01/05/2008 10:23:39
Give over Letsbefair.It's not a handfull of cases,it's the length and breadth of this country.Watch any news or listen to any radio and the justice system is a disgrace.How many times have we heard of someone committing a serious crime,only to be told they had been let off only months before for something similar.
5

helyg,

01/05/2008 10:30:05
Letsbefair what planet are you living on?????? you obviously do NOT watch the news, our justice system is one of the weakest / inadequate in the world - thats a fact
6

Chigley,

01/05/2008 10:47:08
CPS = Criminal Protection Service!
7

MattBingo,

01/05/2008 10:59:44
Letsbefair,You sound like a defence lawyer
8

clive of savile park,

savile park 01/05/2008 11:24:17
both Judge Durham Hall QC and Judge Bartfield are senior, experienced Crown Court Judges and their comments should be listened to and read with this in mind, when Judges of their status criticise the C P S it is time for the powers that be, especially Neil Franklin the head of the C P S in West Yorkshire to take notice. It is rare for a Crown Court Judge to make such comments publicly and this is why their comments should be taken notice of and hopefully, acted upon
9

s.bolton,

01/05/2008 14:48:24
Agree with Growler, they need investigating themselves seems very suspicious to me.
10

exile,

01/05/2008 18:28:23
Sadly the CPS know what anyone who has done Jury Service knows. The people sitting on juries now are illiterate brain dead morons. Unless you are charged with sexual offences against a child you will get off dead easy. Half the Jury are scallies themselves or very sympathetic to scallies.

Having said that, the CPS almost always dilute the charge , or drop it.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.