Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 9th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Academy IS a done deal



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Crag Lane,
Wheatley,
Halifax
It is hard to believe from the consistent, dogmatic and well-rehearsed statements from Labour and Conservative councillors that the unholy drive for an academy school in north Halifax is nothing more than a done deal.

At last we now learn the trut
h of it all and the shameless extent of the done deal, not with Calderdale Council, but between the Government and the Church.

Your article in which the Bishop of Wakefield outlines his "vision for for an academy of the future" ("Courier, March 11) lets the cat out of the bag.

You reported: "The Government approached the Church to discuss the future of schooling in the area after the decision to close the Ridings was made.

"'It opened up for us a conversation about what would be proposed and how it would affect the future of Holy Trinity.'"

Is it therefore any wonder that we ask ourselves: Is anyone out there listening? when we are not part of the conversation, despite council reassurances that councillors have listened to parents, staff and governors.

Even the Church's own clergy are opposed to the plan. As the rural dean of Halifax stated: "Closing the school would be wrong. There is no evidence that an academy would provide a better standard of education."

We now know the real reason that we were not listened to as the conversation is between the Church and central Government – and Calderdale Council is a mere bystander to the most important decision in the lives of children in north Halifax.

Months of local consultation have provided the basis for some kind of local deceit in falling in line with the Government's relentless and uncompromisingly doctrinaire drive towards its national target of 400 academy schools in England – whether or not it is right for north Halifax or whatever the consequences. The heavy hand of Government!
Like our local councillors, Lord Adonis, Under Secretary of State for Schools, "has not flinched from the tough decisions required to set up academies".

What is more surprising is that the Labour group appears to align itself to this passionate, self-confessed meritocrat, a supporter of the academy system based on ability and elitism – in other words, selection.

His view that "academies should become this generation's grammar schools" will find lots of support within the local Labour ranks!
So the decision now appears to be out of our hands, no doubt a matter between the forthcoming feasibility study, the Church and the Government.

It has little to do with improving educational attainment for north Halifax children but simply and unashamedly replacing the crumbling buildings of Holy Trinity Senior School, already designated as an improving school and, outside the selective schools, the best school there in terms of performance.

The new academy will, it seems, continue to safeguard places for those who want a Christian educa- tion for their children, and there's nothing wrong in that, but what it will not do is provide a good local senior school for local children from local primary schools.

Deal or no deal? Calderdale Council's and the Wakefield Diocese's position appears position clear and uncompromising: deal!
It is an unaccountable done deal between the Church and the Government.

Joe Collins



The full article contains 543 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 March 2008 11:20 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
2
1

Marksp,

28/03/2008 12:00:58
I'm delighted, get the new facility built
2

Rob Reynolds,

28/03/2008 18:04:07
Duh! Marksp, academies are more expensive, enjoy your tax hike.
3

Scouse1,

Halifax 28/03/2008 21:49:44
Joe,the only people Councillors listen to, are their accountants in respect of their expenses.
4

rastrick crusader,

Halifax 29/03/2008 07:23:31
it is a great shame but it was clear from the beginning that this was a stitch up. targets and behind the scenes performance deals are more importants than children, parents and teachers concerned. there is still time for a single issue candidate to stand in the ward and win. is there anybody out there?
5

PiratePete,

North Halifax 29/03/2008 14:29:38
Rastrick Crusader, a good idea, but a single-interest councillor is as dangerous for a ward as a party-affilliated one. Not enough people up in this neck of the woods are affected by the academy to bother voting for them.
6

Marksp,

31/03/2008 08:37:32
rob its a faith school the church pay - der
7

vox-pop,

North Halifax 31/03/2008 09:37:19
marksp

No they don't...all the capital and running costs come from central government....or should I say the taxpayers.

The government is pumping in 20million to 30 million pounds into each new academy.

It costs 21,000 pounds a pupil place at an academy twice as much as the cost of a pupil place at another state school which is just under 14,000 pounds.

So much for the church paying...it is the taxpayer...der
8

Marksp,

31/03/2008 10:00:06
vox pop not entirely correct as i am building on right now - der
9

lipman,

31/03/2008 10:58:15
Marksp the church don't pay its taxpayer you and me mate who foot bill.
10

Marksp,

31/03/2008 11:26:03
lets agree to disagree on that one
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Are community galas and carnivals becoming a thing of the past?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.