Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 8th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Evening Courier site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Free power? It just can't be done



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 May 2008
Pye Nest Road,
Halifax.

ALAN Wright ("Reservoirs could give us cheap power", Your say, May 8) thinks that Baitings and similar dams could be used for producing electric power.
He says: "Water released from the base of the dam through pipes into the turbines could then go via a pipeline back into the reservoir."

"There would be nowhere for the water to go but up. The pressure and the weight from the volume of water above
would push it straight back round; it shouldn't even need to be pumped back up."

Gravity determines that water always finds its own level.Therefore the water in the return pipe will only rise to the level of the water in the dam.

Having found its own level and unable to defy gravity to "leap" back into the dam, it will then stop, as will the turbine.

To return the water below or at the surface of the dam would merely create a loop with zero force or circulation to turn the turbine.

To return the water into the dam and turn the turbine would require electric pumps that would consume more energy than that produced by the turbine generators because nothing is 100 per cent efficient due to friction losses.

The first law of physics is that neither matter or energy can be created nor destroyed, only exchanged from one form to another.

For the turbine generators to produce surplus energy after powering the pumps would "create" energy, thus defying the first law of physics and produce perpetual motion, which is impossible.

Ah, well back to the drawing board.

Paul Campbell



The full article contains 275 words and appears in Evening Courier newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 May 2008 10:10 AM
  • Source: Evening Courier
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

HXDave,

halifax 14/05/2008 10:41:16
paul, i think your letter explains pretty much what i put on the comments board of the mentioned letter.....

thanks for the acknowledgement.....
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Web Idol 08: Vote for your favourite. Click here to watch the entries.
1. Frank Crossley
2. Kathy Haigh
3. Sarah Cheesewright
4. Rachel Reinhardt
5. Alan Widdop
6. Amanda Gatehouse
7. Steph Parnham
8. Rick Tomlinson
9. Rebecca Renehan
10. Kelly Dinsmore
11. David North
12. Keith Noe
13. Rose Renehan
14. Ben Healey
15. Prav Makh
16. Matty Harris
17. Doreen Norris
18. Peggy Padgett
19. Kate Stansfield
20. Rachel Cawood
21. Luke Bowers
22. Lyndon Harris
23. Paul Topham
24. Joanne Taylor
25. Gemma Pell
26. Jason Collins
27. Matthew Pell
28. Ian Webber
29. Joanne Beevers
30. Taukeer Butt
31. Bethany Jackson
32. Frank Hunt
33. Zoe Jones
34. Stan Halcrow
35. Omar Jordan
36. Rachael Davis
37. Joseph Bray
38. Sara Shiroda
39. Roisin Geraghty
40. Sarah Teagle
41. Ruth Gardziel
42. Mark Terry

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.