Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Give us some clear answers over HBOS



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 September 2008
Stones Road
Todmorden
Mr Hornby as chief executive of HBOS has admitted personal responsibility for the bank's demise (Courier exclusive by Farhana Haque, Sept 23).

Before accepting that the takeover by Lloyds TSB is inevitable, it seems to me he has some more explaining to do.

He fails to make clear the specific aspects of the demise of HBOS for which he accepts responsibility. Was it the business plan that short sellers found so flawed they felt it was time to act against HBOS? Their motives were clear, making quick profits – not the long-term growth of HBOS – but at the expense of existing shareholders.

What is less clear is what was Mr Hornby's reasoning when he says that "merger talks with Lloyds TSB began five weeks ago" and that "the combination with Lloyds TSB is the right thing to do." Did he consider the position hopeless when HBOS asked its shareholders for £4 billion extra cash?

He goes on to say that "the urgency increased as the global market chaos erupted."

It begins to sound as though what was a good market idea (the combination with Lloyds TSB) was an opportunity not to be missed and that the "unbelievable circumstances .... when its share prices plummeted and the world money markets began to veer wildly" provided the method of avoiding reference under the monopolies legislation. Was it his skill that secured the get together? Mr Hornby should make it clear what he is responsible for.

He states that "HBOS is a well capitalised and profitable bank."

And that "We have a proven record of carefully managing our responsibilities in every community we operate in."

If so, what exactly is he taking responsibility for? Is it failings he and others have yet to make clear and explain?

Or is it simply that he was unfortunate enough to be at the helm when actions by others overwhelmed HBOS and he at least had the foresight to have contacted Lloyds TSB earlier in case a rescue was necessary?
Clear answers would be helpful in guiding shareholders on which way to vote.

PS: it is reported that Mr Hornby is expected to occupy a senior position in the Lloyds-TSB/HBOS group when it is complete.
There may be some former employees and shareholders that find the "acceptance of responsibility" and "senior post" a little contradictory.

Joe Mitchell
Calderdale Trades Council

The full article contains 404 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 September 2008 10:41 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Miss Cynical,

Halifax 29/09/2008 12:18:18
HBOS operated under the principle that as long as demand for housing was greater than the supply (which is still the case even now) then, as long as banks were able to fund ever larger mortgages then house prices would continue to rise, while HBOS used cheap mortgage deals to build a huge customer base to sell current accounts, loans and credit cards to - making extraordinary amounts of profit.

It was a good business model as long as the supply of cheap money was guaranteed forever...
2

Dave U,

Outlane 29/09/2008 18:57:00
first the 'Big Bang' letter (22/9),now this. Labour election campaign?
PS I enjoy reading Joe's letters, even if I disagree with them. Was Joe at the Public meeting last Thursday at NALGO?

PS I'm "David" not "Davis" - for those unfortunates who may have seen the news on TV last Friday. Fiona would have swooned had she seen it!
3

Dave U,

Outlane 29/09/2008 19:13:49
PS I've just read another post here that suggests that Linda, our MP,is fighting some Labour rebels locally.
Where does Joe stand on this?
4

Scouse1,

Halifax 30/09/2008 20:16:09
The person responsible for the current debacle in relation to the demise of once proud/prudent Building Societies,is not only the C.E.O or the Short Sellers within the Hedge Fund Corporations,but John Oliver Spalding, General Manager at The Halifax B.S,who in the early 80s produced The Spalding Report Bill to Parliament,which was eventually accepted by Margaret Thatcher and her cronies, and thus allowed Building Societies free rein to join the rest of the free market forces to sell any financial product they so wished.
Talk about giving Thatcher a State Funeral,let us hope the Pall Bearers are redundant/greedy Bankers.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.