Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Let's talk on GPs' hours



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 February 2008
Keighley Road,
Illingworth,
Halifax
AS a GP I read your editorial headlined "GPs could give more in return" (Courier, February 4) with sadness – sadness that you have fallen for Government spin about GPs.

The current problem over GP opening hours arises from the 2004 contract that was freely agreed between ministers and GPs. The Government now wants to alter that contract significantly, to GPs disadvantage, and without negotiation.
In short, there
is no carrot on offer to GPs at present, just a big stick wielded by an angry Govern- ment. The feeling GPs have is that the Government is negotiating with them in bad faith and by raw exercise of power. Alan Johnson's letter is an iron fist, concealed in a velvet glove.
I accept that taxpayers have had their money poured into the NHS in recent years and have little to show for it. The money has been squandered, but not on salaries. It has gone on overpriced private finance initiative projects (yes, Bob Heys is right) extra management, management consultancy, needless restructurings and £20 billion on the barely functional computer system known as Connecting for Health.
Far too little of the extra Government investment has gone on anything useful to front-line services. Hence the Government's achievement of a huge investment and few happy returns.
As regards GP hours, I accept that current opening hours, 8am to 6.30pm each weekday, are not ideal and there are many who find it hard to get convenient appointments. The problem is recognised both by the British Medical Association (BMA) and the Government.
As a doctor, and for the sake of patient care, I hope the Govern-ment and BMA will get negotiating again, confine the problem to getting a deal about opening hours and leave the contract otherwise unchanged.
Using the mechanism of locally enhanced services, agreed to meet local needs between local primary care trusts and local, willing GPs, this could be achieved with no need for any contract changes or arguments.
If the Government continues to try to bully GPs and impose unfair contract changes on us then we may go the way of the dentists. That is not an outcome doctors, patients or voters really want.
Finally, please, can I assure patients that every doctor I know wants to do the best they can for each patient they treat. That is our basic core commitment to patients: to use knowledge with compassion to help our patients in relationship-based practice.
The current row threatens to hinder our ability to achieve this.
(Dr) Peter Davies



The full article contains 432 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 February 2008 10:00 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Peter Avinou,

Elland 07/02/2008 11:33:43
All should be aware of the wastage that is ever prevalent with our Government - it is of tremendous proportions.
They, and they alone, are responsible, for as you say the practise of consultation is a complete sham!
Dr. Bob Heys, and others including myself have long decried the utter dishonesty practised by these people, on all but that concerning themselves.
How many billions are now outstanding, in all these lucrative for some PFI schemes?
This term is wrong, for this should be PFE (Pay For Ever)
The National debt has been re-introduced by them, without even an honest consultation having ever been undertaken.
They even ignore the advice of those capable of understanding the long term consequences of this policy.
Do they care? not a jot, for they will be living on their huge perks and pensions long before the Pigeons finally land.
Then we wait 30 years for their errors to be made known!!!
My own doctor, and his associates, work hard and long, and yet are forever badgered to do more - this with the big stick carrying the banner of privatisation!
Consultations, I have experience of these at local government level, and I can say that these are a pure exercise of deceit.
The outcome has always been that "their" conception of whatever project has prevailed.
Please be aware that your whole idea of medical care is in the hands of, and at the disposal of ministers without a care - they also left their portfolio about this on their laptop on some transport or other.
I vote no confidence in a government whom, with absolute prudency, cannot get anything of major import right. This applies to all other recent governments too.
Please back your Doctor and his medical practice, any replacement will be truly regretted and certainly not what you already know to be good.

Peter Avinou

2

Barry Leotard,

07/02/2008 14:14:41
Changing Doctors hours to best suit the patients seems like a good idea to me.
3

thanatos,

Hull 07/02/2008 17:20:28
Given that no system is going to please all the people all the time, running a system based on 84% approval ratings seems like a better idea to me, Barry.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.