Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Totally Locally

Sarkozy wrong over the burka

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 July 2009
Prescott Street
Halifax

I write further to the recent comments made by the French president Nicolas Sarkozy, regarding the wearing of a veil and burka by Muslim women.
It is ironic that on the one hand the West raises allegations against Islam that it compels and is harsh, whereas on the other hand we have here a so-called democratic state meddling and interfering in personal matters of others.
Rather than promoting unity and understanding, President Sarkozy used his address on June 22, 2009, to perpetuate pre-existing false stereotypes.
His comments are extremely unhelpful and indeed regrettable, particularly coming from the head of state of acountry in which there are around five million Muslims. President Sarkozy's comments also directly contradict comments made by President Barack Obama recently in a speech in Cairo on June 4 where he said:
"It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practising religion as they see fit – for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We can't disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism."
It appears that this is exactly what President Sarkozy is doing – he is hiding behind the veil of liberalism to disguise the hostility towards Islam.
Moreover, his views on the burka are both factually wrong and ill-informed. The burka is an item of religious dress which many Muslim women choose to wear. However no Muslim woman should be forced to wear it because a fundamental teaching of Islam is that "there shall be no compulsion in religion." France should adopt the policy of Britain which is not to interfere in an individual's personal matter which is exactly what a secular and democratic state should do.
Muslims in Britain are extremely fortunate that they can practice their religion freely – a right which is not even enjoyed in some so-called Muslim states.
There is no punishment in Islam for not wearing the veil yet here a so-called enlightened State is attempting to punish its citizens for the clothing they wear. What a tragedy.
Is the French Government now going to follow and show Taliban-like tendencies by dictating what people can and can't do? I certainly hope not.
I do hope that France does not pursue this legislation which would contravene both Article 18 of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights and France's Declaration of Rights of Man and of the Citizen on which the French Constitution is based. These ensure freedom to practise religion and hold religious beliefs.
For freedom to reign, freedom must be preserved.
Farooq Aftab

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 July 2009 8:23 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

Peter Avinou,

01/07/2009 09:00:09
When in Rome?
2

jigsaw,

Halifax 01/07/2009 09:02:38
Ah, yes. The "freedom to practse religion and hold religious beliefs". Very important that one.

Like the freedom to be a christian in a Muslim state without being persecuted or having ones church set alight?

Equality is a great thing, as long as I am always more equal than everybody else..............
3

H.X.Dave,

halifax 01/07/2009 09:28:33
the quote " France should adopt the policy of Britain which is not to interfere in an individual's personal matter which is exactly what a secular and democratic state should do." makes me laugh

britain does not interfere because it's too scared of the 'do gooders' that will come out and object if we try to do the same as france, and unfortunately Britain is that soft that we bow down to them. We should take the french view ourselves, and if they dont like it, they can go to other countries where they can do what they like!

Finally, have to agree 100% with Peter in comment 1.
4

Amish,

01/07/2009 09:30:13
What a load of rubbish!!
Sarkozy was quite right.
I wonder what the reaction would be if you were a Christian or Jew in Iran and published or tried to publish an article there defending European principles, and attacking local ones?
5

Barry Von Leotard,

01/07/2009 09:53:24
Covering the face has and never will be socially acceptable in this country. It's not primarily a religous issue but one of courtesy and integration.
6

Chigley,

01/07/2009 10:07:13
I would like to hear a woman's view....

I find them offensive and oppresive.
7

Barry Von Leotard,

01/07/2009 10:10:09
#6 The woman who wear them will claim it's through choice. Not that anyone in Burka would ever lower themselves to speak to you in person.
8

Amish,

01/07/2009 10:13:20
Would not Mr. Aftab do better by persuading the women of his religion to adopt western style dress and therefore promote integration?
After all, he states that Muslims are not forced by their religion to adhere to a dress code.
9

Barry Von Leotard,

01/07/2009 10:17:52
#8 Not true Amish woman are forced to cover up Islamically so we don't rape them. After all being raped is solely the fault of the female and apparently covering your hair and face prevents this from happening. You will need 4 witnesses though or should you make an accusation you will be lashed for adultery.
10

Peter Avinou,

01/07/2009 10:45:54
Mr. Aftab
Can you imagine the position an unidentifiable person places itself in if an incident arises around it?
There could be really serious consequences from any warrant/weapon carrying officer of the Police or other services? Being shot dead is one!
Not all officers take that extra step forward to be sure.
This "for your eyes only policy" is an obstruction to integration and there's little chance of any dialogue with such an unknown quantity?
Out of pure self preservation interests it is better to be fully recognizable?
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.