Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Totally Locally

Think again on smoking

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 December 2007
Weatherhouse Terrace,
Pellon,
Halifax.
Where would he suggest they go – outside the hospital walls, drip stand and all, to get nearer to the more damaging effect of traffic pollution?
They are outside, as the law states; that should be more than enough. Surely they can be allowed this one bit of space to smoke in peace?
I am a non-smoker – I don't like the smell or the taste – but I will defend the rights of others to smoke if they wish to. I think it is terrible that they are sent outside all public buildings in all weathers to do so, when a well-ventilated enclosed room for smokers would do just as well.
People who have smoked all their lives cannot just give up like that, and if you are ill or have broken bones or whatever else is wrong with you, under stress and being forced into not smoking will not help.
My dad smoked from the age of 18 until just before his death last year, aged 88.
He described smoking as his one remaining pleasure; he didn't drink and was no longer capable of looking after his garden, where he used to happily combine the two. I think it's all now gone too far. You are not allowed to smoke in the Westgate "greenhouse" because it's an enclosed space, yet it is open on all sides.
Businesses have lost trade due to this smoking ban. I feel sorry for the cafe owners there; they had already lost trade during the building of this thing and are now losing more custom as people are huddling together on pavement cafes to enjoy a cuppa and a cig.
And then there is the effect on the pub trade. The ban has hit hard and unless the Government has a rethink the loss of revenue will only become greater, which means taxes will rise on other items to realise the shortfall – which might just affect people like Mr Leach.
We all have a vice – drink, chocolates, crisps, collecting train numbers... What if these things become no-nos in years to come?
I say: live and let live. There are enough little Hitlers in the world
Janice Dodsworth

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 December 2007 10:47 AM
  • Source: Evening Courier
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

farmer,

24/12/2007 15:52:14
There are more non smokers than smokers, so I think the majority have more of a right NOT to breath it in
2

Richard Langford,

Brighouse 24/12/2007 23:57:29
As a democrat i believe the people shoud make all descisions. The Smoking Ban was never put to the people. No member of the public voted either for or against it . Isn't it funny how Labour can Invade forieng countries and murder hundreds of thosends of innocent people in the name of DEMOCRACY but deny the people they rule over access to that same political process.
3

ChrisC,

Cornwall 26/12/2007 00:48:29
What a sensible letter. It shows that not all non-smokers are anti-smokers. That small percentage of anti-smokers rode roughshod over the wishes of tolerant people and, with their exaggerations and lies created a serious division in our society. There may be more non-smokers than smokers but that should not be an excuse for victimising a large majority. Majoritarianism is not Democracy and unlike true Democracy fails to provide for ALL its citizens.
4

Barney Rubble,

26/12/2007 09:00:46
If pubs, restaurants or cafes want to provide for smokers, they should be allowed to. Not by forming Smoking or Non-Smoking pubs etc, but by enforcing proper facilities within their buildings. A designated smoking room with proper ventilation/smoke extractors. Not the pathetic attempts at segragation we have seen in the past, where smoking tables were placed right next to non-smoking ones, but were so close you could light their fag!
5

KINGCROSSITE and EX Soldier ,

26/12/2007 17:57:34
Ever sat in a ward with the window open ? all you can taste and smell is cig smoke. Its banned end of story! Shurrup moaning about it .
6

DaveA,

London 26/12/2007 19:19:33
What a good letter. All you anti smokers, I hope you have been reading your papers, but since they started bullying the smokers I am sure you are aware that "obesity is worse than smoking" and "passive drinking is worse than passive smoking". Yes those of you who drink, eat crisps and chocolate are worse than me. Just Google these quotes and confirm it yourself. I sure in these cases you will be first to the barracades defending your rights and having to fight off the "live with it" quotes.
7

Barney Rubble,

27/12/2007 09:06:34
DaveA, there are Laws in place to curb the effects of passive drinking. However, until there was a ban on smoking in public places, there were no Laws to ban the effects of passive smoking. The ignorant smokers (and I'm not saying all smokers are ignorant) would just say 'if you don't like it, go somewhere else'! And the non-smokers amongst us would just have to live with it.
8

edwin turner,

sowerby bridge 28/12/2007 22:10:22
crime-up burglaries----up assult---up ciggies--down how strange the motions of law move
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.