Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Concerns raised over Lloyds TSB takeover terms as HBOS shares plummet further



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 September 2008
Market doubts were growing today over the terms of Lloyds TSB's planned takeover of struggling HBOS.
HBOS's shares fell 12 per cent today and have lost more than half their value in the past two weeks - raising concerns over whether the deal will have to be repriced to gain the approval of Lloyds TSB shareholders.

Meanwhile fears over last night's derailing of the 700 billion US dollar (£388bn) banking bail-out for US financial institutions also weighed on bank stocks.

Lloyds has offered 0.833 of its own shares - currently equivalent to 187p - for every HBOS share in a deal valuing the lender at £9.8 billion.

But HBOS shares were trading 33 per cent below this at around 125p today, raising questions over whether the takeover would be waved through as it currently stands.

Alex Potter, Collins Stewart banking analyst, said: "The market is implying that (the deal) does not happen."

Numis Securities analyst Gurgit Kambo added: "There are clearly some concerns. The uncertainty is if shareholders vote against it, then it won't go through."

An HBOS spokesman shrugged off the concerns today. He said: "This is the right deal for HBOS shareholders. We are already working on the integration planning process and it is full steam ahead as far as we are concerned.

"Share price volatility in bank stocks is part of the menu at the moment. These are not normal times."

Despite last night's rejection, there were hopes that a bail-out could yet be agreed by US politicians in Congress, possibly on Thursday or Friday.

This would help restore confidence in markets stunned by the latest twists of the global banking crisis - which has seen Bradford & Bingley nationalised this week and a host of other players given state-bailouts or taken over in Europe and the US.

HBOS sought a takeover by Lloyds TSB to bring stability to the business after a run on its shares in the wake of the collapse of US investment bank Lehman Brothers, and concerns over higher funding costs in frozen inter-bank markets.

If the deal goes ahead, it will create a "mega-bank" with nearly a third of the UK mortgage market and more than £300 billion of deposits.

It will also have around 3,000 branches, leapfrogging industry titan Royal Bank of Scotland's 2,300 sites and dwarfing HSBC, which has around half.

The full article contains 407 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 September 2008 12:40 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

conn3rz,

30/09/2008 13:30:22
this whole world wide banking thing must be someones fault - i dont understand all the politics. What has actually happend to make the world almost collapse like this? Whos bad judgement was it and when will we see the end of this evergrowing melt down?!?!?!?1
2

Lunchbox Len Returns!,

30/09/2008 13:54:48
Conn3rz... basically... it's a mixture between the banks fault, and "the city" where the trading occurs...

It is the banks fault as they were lending people 4 and 5 or even 6 times peoples salary so that they could get on the property ladder. the banks then lent their money from this out from american banks and as the american banks started loosing confidence in the economy, the city had a knock on effect and then the shares plummeted etc etc... I personally also think the media have a hand in this as well. Ultimatley though, i think this is a wider conspiracy by the american government. I bet you that Bush sweeps in before election time and saves the day... then everyone will vote for the republicans and the "bush administration" will get in again...
3

Lunchbox Len Returns!,

30/09/2008 13:55:59
oh, by the way... at 5 or 6 times the salary, people couldnt afford the repayments and that's what kicked it off... sorry, missed that bit out...
4

MattBingo,

30/09/2008 13:58:48
Nothing to do with the greedy consumers then.Who could never afford the repayments but took them out anyway.
5

MattBingo,

30/09/2008 13:59:43
We live in a(i need it,gotta have it)society.
6

Lunchbox Len Returns!,

30/09/2008 14:04:14
true MattBingo... but the financial sector should have played a greater responsibility in ensuring that we weren't lent more than we could afford...

I think i then agree that it was the greedy consumers, greedy banks and the greedy city traders. GREED = root of all evil.
7

R.Swipe,

30/09/2008 14:13:42
Im not greedy, I just like a lot!!!!!
8

Lunchbox Len Returns!,

30/09/2008 14:38:52
like a lot of people R.Swipe!!
9

MattBingo,

30/09/2008 16:15:05
So you are saying when we are drunk,the landlords should not serve more.
When we are full,the waiter can not serve you a pudding.
Take responsibility for your own actions.The banks are not to blame,the consumer is.But having said that,the banks cannot complain now the consumer cannot afford to repay the monies owed,as they were too quick to hand it out.
Bad banking management.
10

joker!!,

30/09/2008 16:30:13
mattbingo, im not having a go at you buddy but?
do you own your own house?? mortgage etc or do you rent?
if you own your own house, why did you buy it...??
im not saying you cant afford it you might be a millionaire, but everyone knows renting is dead money, paying for something you will never own, if the banks were stupid enough to lend it to people on disability allowance and other benefits which i have also heard of, why shouldnt these people take it as well as low earners?
if someone offered you ten grand in the street would you take it or say "no mate" and carry on walking.
Everyone cashed in on the current BOOM
mortgage advisors (who should be to blame but can now stand behind the FSA warnings they give at every consultation)
estate agents, mortgage lenders, people selling houses for riduclous prices and people buying them!! everyone is to blame for the greed!! its just some of us in the near future will be able to cope with it as we used our noggins when taking out mortgages, and we didnt keep our heads in the clouds about IF the market crashed which surprise surprise it has!!
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Sing a Song for Christmas 2008: Choose your favourite
All Saints
Bailiffe Bridge
Barbara's
Beech Hill
Burnley Road Primary
Burnley Road Singing for Fun
Cragg Vale
Elland
Field Lane
Hebden Royd
Lee Mount
Lightcliffe
Ling Bob
Lorraine
Maltings
New Road
Northowram
Parkinson Ln
Sacred Heart
Savile Park
St John's
St Joseph's
St Malachy's Primary
St Malachy's Singing for Fun
St Mary's, Halifax
St Mary's, Mill Bank
Sowerby Village
Stubbings
Triangle

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.