Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 13th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Evening Courier site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Confused over councillors' timesheets? You will be



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 March 2008
FILLING in timesheets has left some councillors confused with some individuals claiming 128 days off during a month and over 60 days leave.
But there are a number of councillors who have still to submit their "activity sheets" for January and some are several months behind on their paperwork.

The confusion has come over a change in policy. Until now, councillors could put three hours
on their time sheet for every episode of sickness or holiday absence.

But from January, time spent away from council duties has had to be recorded as days lost, leading to some councillors putting down three days instead of the previous three hours.

Geoffrey Wainwright (Con, Skircoat), is recorded as having taken 128 days off during January, cabinet member Amanda Byrne took 63 days leave and David Ginley (Con, Warley), was either on holiday or ill for 38 days in the month.

There are a number of the remaining 48 councillors who have still to submit any sheet.

Paul Rogan (Eng Dem, Rastrick) said: "This oversight will no doubt confirm what many people already think about the abilities of some councillors.

"It's a simple matter really, councillors have only to read the instructions they all voted for and follow them correctly," he said.

Councillor Byrne (Sowerby Bridge) said she hadn't realised there was an error until it was pointed out by the Courier.

"It was probably because I filled in the December and January forms at the same time – I will have to look at it again," she said.

There was an outcry last year when the Courier revealed that two councillors hadn't filled in their time sheets for a year and several more were six months behind with their record keeping.



The full article contains 294 words and appears in Evening Courier newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 March 2008 9:24 AM
  • Source: Evening Courier
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

the g-stringed avenger,

Hanging out 19/03/2008 10:19:57
We can all sleep safely, and contentedly in our beds, (or indeed someone else's) knowing the future of our beloved country is in such good, and capable hands.
2

HXDave,

halifax 19/03/2008 10:20:14
Oh My God........
if they can't even fill in a time sheet, how the heck can we trust them to run our council?
3

hmmm77,

19/03/2008 10:37:52
And we are supposed to be able to trust them with our money because.....?
4

ticked off,

Halifax 19/03/2008 10:41:53
Dont you just love paying all your council tax to keep these wonderful people in a lifestyle they have become accustomed to!
5

Peter Avinou,

Elland 19/03/2008 13:02:50
Oh Boy, Here we go again.
The Courier, having stirred up one Hornets nest about this matter, is again attaching unproportional importance to these things yet again.
Heavens isn't there enough for The Courier to pursue with our Council, you know, things that matter, like the latest sneaky notice about parking charges, the issue of £K78 on their duff hearing, the excessive reliance on Consultancies and the cost of these?
This is another Red Herring swimming about to confuse the issues?
I have stated my views on Councillors daily " let me think, where was I sheets" in that these are a waste of resources, say nothing that cannot be better discovered on The Calderdale Web Site, and cannot be referenced in any way at all by the public.
Many Councillors have made known that their agreement was obtained in a suspect manner, and that they no longer agree with them.
Now, if The Courier were to start asking the Cabinet, to justify, and similarly record their reasons for all those decisions taken without majority consent of the full Council and the public. Then I would be keen to keep up to date.
Time sheets, Activity Logs? I'll continue reading my Horoscope - just as convincing!
Will this happen? Not on your nelly!
6

Peter Avinou,

Elland 19/03/2008 13:26:08
Just noticed, it's Mr. M. Peel again, "the 91% of Calderdale residents agree to the introduction of Wheelie Bins" whilst only 54% of the residents agree to Wheelie Bins"
A way of swinging the Cabinet vote?
7

the g-stringed avenger,

Looking for paper 19/03/2008 13:35:50
Well I mean,

Peter if you are always so long-winded, perhaps, indeed if you have not already, installed a computer in your toilet. Or in your case a toilet in your computer, programmed to recycle all the hot air you generate on a daily basis. That way you could save the planet whilst spouting crap.
8

John Mann,

Hipperholme 19/03/2008 14:09:54
Three words, Peter: sense of proportion.
9

Peter Avinou,

Elland 19/03/2008 15:59:39
john Mann,
the g-stringed avenger,
You don't do that badly yourself flower, there again I do say something, right or wtong!
Which is better then merely sniping like you and dear Say nought Mann.
10

Rob Reynolds,

19/03/2008 16:00:52
Yes! Here we go again! How many who complain, voted Labour in 1997? This is a LABOUR change in the way the Council was run. Paraded as "modernisation", they introduced Cabinet management, whopping increases in Councillor allowances, computers, and mobile phones for Cllrs and abolished pay according to attendance. Forget the timesheets (actually activity sheets), why is the courier not questioning the stupidity of a system where you get paid for NOT attending committees? This didn't happen before LABOUR changed the rules.
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.