Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Group plans to fight Crosslee homes proposal

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 March 2010
CONTROVERSIAL plans to build 160 homes on land owned by tumble-drier maker Crosslee will be discussed by councillors on Tuesday.
The outline planning application would, if successful, see land developed to the east of the factory at Spout House Lane, Hove Edge, Brighouse.

The proposals have caused controversy, with Hipperholme and Lightcliffe Environmental Group vowing to fight development.

And, in a separate twist, an outline application has also been submitted to build dozens of homes nearby on the site of Danehurst Garage, St Giles Road, Lightcliffe.

The Crosslee site is allocated for employment land and the company has said disposing of it for housing would release more money at a difficult economic time.

The plans would help to maintain its position as a major employer. Crosslee employs 420 and at seasonal peaks temporary staff push that figure beyond 500.

A report from planners to the planning committee said the proposal would be acceptable, subject to conditions. It said the retention of employment at Crosslee outweighed reasons for not allowing the development.

An application from Tuck Royd Quarry, Halifax Road, Brighouse, could also see more than 60 homes built on the Denehurst Garage site which is bordered by Spout House Lane and Green Lane.

The land is currently used for stone storage, sorting and cutting and also for the repair and storage of coaches.

A decision on that application is expected in June.

Hipperholme and Lightcliffe Environmental Group has been campaigning to keep employment land protected from housing.

Chris O'Connor, chairman, said he feared a rush of applications ahead of new planning guidelines to replace the current unitary development plan. It is likely to be 2012 before the Local Development Framework is in place.

He said if the Crosslee application was successful it would set a precedent, adding: "It has always been my fear that once one application was in. everybody would jump on the bandwagon.

"It could open the floodgates and we could lose all the employment land we have and we will continue to battle against that."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 March 2010 10:26 AM
  • Source: Evening Courier Main
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

PosterMeerkat,

12/03/2010 15:01:10
With 3,300 empty homes in Calderdale and goodness know how many others on the market - why? http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/3300-homes-stand-empty-in.6141352.jp
2

Plinkety-plonk,

12/03/2010 15:08:54
I used to live next door to that land off St Giles Road, and it's plain nasty. Houses would be a big improvement. Being next to that eyesore is a big reason I moved out (That and the scroat who lived over the road)
Having said all that - it is flat land, and surely that's what we need for employment. If people don't have jobs, they can't buy houses - or is that just too simplistic a way of thinking.
3

Bill Withers,

12/03/2010 15:30:35
#1 - the 3200 are tower block flats and Council Estate semi's, with the odd cheap new build apartment thrown in. It wouldn't surprise me if the waiting list at the Council was higher than this.

If we're to attract young professionals/graduates we need good quality family housing, there's no shortage of that.

That said, not sure why we need to lose employment land!
4

Peter Avinou,

12/03/2010 15:32:32
More houses, more kids to school.
more patients for surgery's.
more buses to ship people and pupils.
More cars.
More holdups and congestion on busy routes.
More of everything else.
Less employment sites.
Again more traffic.
When we have over 3000 vacant properties?
Why?

5

exhecman,

12/03/2010 15:42:15
#2 - How dare you call me a scroat!
6

MaidenMad,

22, Acacia Avenue 12/03/2010 18:34:37
#4 Peter, "my glass is always half empty!" Why not make it 3001 vacant properties and move out of the area, don't forget to "pack" your expert knowledge on how a council should be run with you. Has Harry Enfield once summarised in a character, "You don't want to do it like that, you want to do it like this" I'm sure you'd be missed?
7

Peter Avinou,

13/03/2010 09:31:38
#6 MaidenMad
Your chosen non de plume certainly suits.
Having lived in my home for probably longer than you have existed, why should I move because you do not agree with my comments?
Take a deep inward look and realise that your comments will be equally disliked by many others, including myself.
I hope you remember the look of grass, because the way your feelings come across, we'll soon need a Video to remind us that grass ever existed.
Come back soon, your views are always needed. As is those of everyone else?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.