Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Smoking ban: Council cracks down after 46 complaints about law breakers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
04 February 2008
A TOTAL of 46 complaints have been made about people flouting the smoking ban in Calderdale.
Calderdale Council has received the reports of people breaking the law since the ban on lighting up indoors was introduced six months ago.

One fixed penalty notice has been issued and 43 written warnings have been given for allowing smoking in a public place.

The council has issued a massive 346 written warnings to businesses for failing to display non-smoking signs.

One premises is under investigation for allegedly allowing smoking inside.

A ban on smoking indoors came into effect on July 1.

Landlords face a hefty £2,500 fine if they let people smoke inside and anyone caught smoking has to pay £50.

The ban also means owners of smoke-free buildings can be handed a £200 on-the-spot fine if they don't put up no-smoking signs.

Members of the public can report anyone they see breaching the ban by calling a freephone helpline.

Enforcing the new ban is down to the council's environmental health department.

Calderdale Council has pledged to crack down on any premises that allows smoking indoors.

Last month Halifax man Stuart Smith appeared in court charged with allowing people to smoke at the College Arms, Huddersfield.

Mr Smith, 39, of Newlands Farm, Warley, pleaded not guilty to flouting the ban and failing to display no smoking signs.

He was remanded on bail for a pre-trial review on February 29.

The pub, which is shut, is owned by Admiral Taverns, said Mr Smith was not the licensee of the pub.

The full article contains 274 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2008 4:17 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1

yorkshirepudding,

hfx 04/02/2008 18:28:07
freephone number???? Who is funding THAT! Surely there are more important things. Come on. Give us smelly anti-social smokers a break. It's all the tax we pay on the ciggies funding the free phone number. Hmmpf!
2

smokingbanstinks.co.uk,

Leeds 04/02/2008 18:39:04
The pub industry is in crisis with 57 closing every month. The economic fallout from the ban is far reaching.
www.innthecold.com
3

exile,

04/02/2008 19:02:27
smokingstinks.co.uk
youknowitdoes.co.uk
pubsareclosingbythedozenbecausetheyarentwanted.co.uk
4

gaildear13,

04/02/2008 19:35:04
It is apparently illegal to smoke in the doorway. You have to be actually outside totally.

I think its a damn nuicance when you are trying to walk into a pub and ignorant smokers won't move to let you pass. When you squeeze past them, they look at you funny.

What a stupid law. No wonder people stay at home.
The final nail in the coffin for the pub industry.

All the pubs to let then end up being run by trailer park trash, then the pub finally gets turned into more flats.

5

turpin,

04/02/2008 20:18:31
pub owners and patrons nationwide ought to form a union to better protect their civil rights, and have their voices heard.
6

outsidelookingin,

outside 04/02/2008 20:20:59
I live where there are no pubs and I cant think of anyone I know that smokes.We all socialise by visiting neighbours . Why do you need smelly pubs with smelly toilets and the fear of walking home.When I lived in Halifax there were local pubs,clean and friendly. ARE THERE ANY LEFT? We expats only hear of bad ones.
7

bm4260,

Elland 04/02/2008 20:33:54
smokingbanstinks.co.uk - The traditional pub is now a thing of the past. The lower social orders like myself no longer frequent the pub as our incomes are too low. Drinking in drinking establishments is now for those on incomes way above the minimum wage or the middle classes who demand more than the traditional local pub has to offer. The latest gov stats show that the lower social orders like my good self now drink less far less than those described as the middle classes. Society has moved pubs have not and need to!
8

4evaleeds,

Halifax 04/02/2008 21:32:44
I am sick to the back teeth of all this fuss over where you can and can not smoke. As a smoker I feel as I don't have any rights in whats supposed to a free country. As for Calderdale Council, what a set of useless idiots, its about time they spent more time and money on services and improvements in the area etc than getting all in flap about who's smoking where they shouldn't be. The smoking ban is a joke
9

Tommy2008,

04/02/2008 21:59:13
isn't this more important,
http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/Halifax-town-centre-one-of.3740127.jp

Halifax town centre one of worst for uninsured drivers.

get your priorities right,
10

Barry Leotard,

04/02/2008 22:18:49
I am glad to see that there are 45 other people in Calderdale with the same sense of public spirit as myself.

The smoking ban and recent rises in drink prices have only complemented each other with their effect. The smoking ban has driven the lower classes outside to smoke and the increased prices have driven them outide to drink. It's not the first time this has worked in making somewhere more pleasant to visit. Look at football, for years the sport of the working class; now suddenly priced out the game, the result? A dramatic reduction in violence and racial abuse at players.
Prev
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.