Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Harveys

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Why didn't they ask us?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 March 2008
WORK to transform an iconic 19th century viaduct into a cycle path has been stopped after residents and police said they did not want it.
Work had already begun turning the disused line into a 500-metre bitumen track linking Rochdale Road, Stainland Road and Saddleworth Road, West Vale.
But councillors, who had not granted permission for the council project, ordered it to stop – because they fear the track, with no lights and out of public view, would attract anti-social behaviour and cause environmental damage.
Now Sustrans, a national cycling organisation which was paying for the work, will pull their £100,000 funding from the district.
Peter Coles (Lib Dem, Ludd Ft) said: "It would be a shame to lose this money but we have to start listening to what people want – and people living near this track seem unanimous in not wanting it."
Nearby residents feared the path would become a haven for under-age drinkers, with a police report suggesting a planned fence on the viaduct could encourage youths to throw stones at oncoming cars. It suggested lives may be lost.
Helen Woodworth, of Bank Field Grange, Greetland, added: "It is so arrogant of the council to begin this work without even getting planning permission. If they'd consulted us they would have known the only communities this would link are two communities who hate the idea."
A spokesman for the project apologised for not waiting.
But he said delays may have meant not getting the cash from Sustrans, which was to be matched by £20,000 from council coffers.
He said: "The view was taken we should start the preliminary work to make sure we met the Sustrans deadline.
"They are happy to undo the work."
Sustrans, which hoped the route would form part of a larger National Cycle Network, said it may appeal the decision.
The Grade Two listed viaduct was built in 1874 for the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway and has been redundant for decades.

The full article contains 335 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 March 2008 3:06 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

HXDave,

halifax 15/03/2008 09:01:38
quote "But councillors, who had not granted permission for the council project, ordered it to stop"

is it just me, or does this mean the council did not know what was happening regarding a project it was carrying out?

how inept is our council?
2

edwin turner,

sowerby bridge 16/03/2008 00:17:45
i tend to agree with the residents it would be easy
to go offending then disapear over the paths
3

we want our country back,

16/03/2008 18:10:00
lets vote them out of office. there are two types of refugee, one lives on the street because of nowhere to go. the other gets a job in local government
4

Aunty Kneejerk,

West Vale 17/03/2008 10:57:26
This looks like an excellent scheme. West Vale is a notorious bottle-neck, jammed up every morning. When you consider that much of this traffic will be parents driving their loved ones to the local high school just think how many car journeys will be removed if the kids can walk or cycle across this traffic-free alternative. Come on Council - don't be put off by a few NIMBY's and a vociferous minority who rubbish everything you do (why does that seem to include you 'Councillor' Coles??).
5

Paul Cairns,

Highroad Well, Halifax 18/03/2008 20:03:21
It will be a very sad loss for Calderdale if this cycle path doesn't get built. Certainly there ought to have been consultation beforehand - but grants distributed by national bodies (here Sustrans) are usually tied to spending deadlines these days.

Concerns over possible anti-social behaviour have been over-played. Anothe local viaduct, at Cullingworth, has been successfully opened to cyclists in recent years - without trouble. I have personal experience of similar ex-rail routes (in North London) which pass cheek-by-jowl through residential neighbourhoods - and which are very popular and enjoyed in peace.

This is an imaginative use for a major landmark that is a fantastic monument to the Victorians who built this area. Cyclists, like railways, need flat routes - the viaduct provides just that. Britain lags way behind our contintental neighbours in cycle provision and we all pay the price. Maybe some of the objectors should try riding up a steep hill with aggressive traffic buzzing round at every turn of the cranks. And then try it again with children. I know, I have.

Please, please don't reject this chance to get a boon for the area handed us on a plate.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.