Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 22nd August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Busy time on stage for Oliver



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Oliver Twist
Calderdale Theatre School
Square Chapel
Condensing Oliver Twist for the stage is no easy task.
Louise Clark and Stephen Finegold, directing Neil Bartlett's adaptation, looked to physical theatre and body language to project the story rather than the spoken word.
This made for a busy if rather gimmicky production in which choreography at t
imes took over, impeding emotional engagement with the action. However, against a dark set on which ingenious use was made of wooden trunks, the opening tableau effectively and thematically anticipated the casual violence and callous victimisation prevailing in London's polarised society. Bill Sikes's gruesome death was tellingly delineated.
Body language invariably proved more expressive of character than the spoken word.
Bill Sikes (Rowan Carter) was often inaudible but his brutal nature was never in doubt.
Voice projection was a weakness generally – many lines thrown away, spoken too quickly or indistinctly to be heard at the back.
If only everyone had delivered their lines with the clarity and intelligence of the smallest narrator.
Other exceptions were Joseph Cotten as Oliver and Daniel Hutchinson as Charley.
Patrick Costello had the measure of Fagin and there were confident performances from Joseph Finegold, Annie Faulds and Joe Ferguson.
Julia Anderson



The full article contains 207 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 June 2008 12:33 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

CJenkins,

Bradford 21/06/2008 13:04:22
I went to see this production on Thursday night and thought it a most ingeneous telling of Dickens classic. I am a drama teacher and always try to see as many of the shows performed by local young people as I can. This production was fantastic. It was inventive and told a well trodden story through fresh ideas which illuminated many themes. Long may Stephen Finegold and Louise Clark experiment with new ways to tell old stories, long may the young people of Calderdale Theatre School have the tenacity to produce such excellent work and eschew the dreary replication of commercial theatre so loved by school drama departments.
2

R>L>C..,

Halifax 22/06/2008 19:50:59
As a member of calderdale theatre school i would like to say that a lot of effort has been put into this fabulous production. Calderdale Theatre are known for putting on ensemble performances using physical theatre so yes, physical acting was very influential throughout the performance. Although I do agree that the people mentioned in the review gave excellent performances and deserve praise, I don't think that anybody gave a bad performance or deserved a bad review. I disagree entirely that the production was "gimmicky" and Jez, Louise, Steve, Rob, Nick and everyone else involved deserve huge credit for an amazing show.
3

Jenny Capple,

Huddersfield 23/06/2008 13:09:32
What a pompous, sniffy review. These are kids trying their best to do something useful and interesting. What a pity this reviewer feels unable to support them. Has she any experience of reviewing theatre? I was enchanted by this wonderful show. My husband rarely goes to the Theatre but is a avid collector of all things Dickens so we went along to see what is was all about. We loved the show it was lovely to see the kids being so positive and creative. Yes it was a little difficult to hear some of them but they are young kids!! What on earth do you expect. Please show a little respect for kids that are trying their best and don't pick out individuals for criticism it is simply unprofessional and unfair.
4

David Drew,

Halifax 23/06/2008 15:20:18
I went to see this fantastic show and was keen to hear how our loved local paper would support the children performers. Having read this dreary review of the show I now know what AA gill meant when he said theatre critics are cultures traffic wardens!
5

annettte,

Halifax 23/06/2008 23:07:52
I must say this is a bit mean. yes there were interesting ideas which sometimes worked and sometimes didn't. But that is the point of innovation it might not work all the time. What does julia anderson want?That we should all have to sit through the same old thing every time we see a classic adaptation? No theatre can only really keep the classics going by trying to find new ways of expressing the same ideas. If Louise Clark and Steven Finegold are trying to expand the horizons of these kids and their audience they should be applauded. Please,Ms Anderson, less of the old fasioned school Ma'am and more encouragement of worthwhile causes.
6

Daniel hutchinson,

Halifax 23/07/2008 20:48:14
I was in that play,and many of my freinds who where involved in the play felt very upset with what the reviewer said i think its too harsh especially for a nice local kid play
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.