Tour de France: Froome looking forward to racing again

Chris Froome
Chris Froome

Chris Froome was looking forward to going racing again at the 100th Tour de France today after a rest day in which his patience finally began to crack in the face of more doping questions.

Facing interrogation about performance-enhancing drugs now seems to be as much a part of the routine of wearing the Tour leader’s yellow jersey as the daily podium appearance and post-race press conference.

It has only been amplified this year after Lance Armstrong’s house of cards finally came crashing down, but after a week of answering essentially the same question every day - ‘Can you assure us you are riding clean?’ - the patience of Froome and Team Sky began to run out yesterday.

“I just think it’s quite sad that we’re sitting here the day after the biggest victory of my life, a historic win, talking about doping,” said Froome, less than 24 hours removed from his stunning victory atop Mont Ventoux.

“My team-mates and I have been away from home for months training together and working our arses off to get here, and here I am accused of being a cheat and a liar.”

Sky’s problem is that, while there is no hard evidence against them, the doping scandals that have plagued cycling for so long now mean that those in yellow can find themselves assumed guilty until proven innocent, and proving innocence is extremely difficult.

Jonathan Vaughters, manager of the Garmin-Sharp team whose strict anti-doping policy serves as a means of redemption for himself and veteran rider David Millar - both guilty of doping infractions in the past - fears there is nothing Sky can do but wait for history to judge.

“People say: what is the solution? The solution is: you have to let time pass,” he said.

“In 10 years, my hope and belief is that we’ll look at this period and say: okay, it was true. Just like we look back 10 years now and say: It was false.

“I don’t see an immediate answer. How do we stop the scepticism? In a way it would be irresponsible to stop the scepticism. We have to be patient, and that is hard.”